The rise and fall of BranchOut

Very interesting post by Marc Drees, showing what’s behind the numbers of the rise and fall of BranchOut on his blog RecruitmentMatters

Why viral and gamification on BranchOut does not necessarily lead to value creation…you said Ponzi?

Way, way back, on April 19, 2012, BranchOut impressed the online recruitment community with incredible growth numbers. CEO Rick Marini boasted 25 million people who signed up for his service and mentioned a growth rate of three new users signing up per second! No wonder he could also proudly mention another round of funding, a stunning $25 million, bringing the total to $49 million … all-around impressive.

Monthly average users, April 19 – June 5. Source: AppData, Facebook

However, the world of BranchOut looks completely different today, at least according to the data provided by AppData and Facebook. They present what is called the monthly average users number. And when we look at the development of this figure since the date of Marini’s moment of glory, we get this picture:

BranchOut peaked in the period of April 27-29 with a total MAU of 13.9 million. Today that number is just 6.5 million, a loss of a staggering 7.4 million MAU in just 37 days. That relates to a loss of 2.3 MAU per second! At this rate BranchOut will hit zero MAU in just over a month, or 33 days.

How is it possible that at one moment a site can grow so fast only to suddenly reverse course and plummet nearly as fast? There is a word for such an event: Ponzi. BranchOut is nothing but a Ponzi scheme. When you sign up for BranchOut, it is really, really easy to inadvertently send out BranchOut invitations to all your friends on Facebook (to a Facebook imposed maximum of 50). Not only that, you also allow BranchOut to repeat this process multiple times over. This is the reason for the large number of complaints of Facebook users regarding BranchOut spam.

More importantly, this tsunami of BranchOut invitations grew exponentially with each new user signing up for the service, up until the point that the whole of the Facebook community had received BranchOut invitations multiple times over. That is the moment that the growth engine of this classic Ponzi stops. Which happened somewhere during April, possibly even before Marini proudly presented his massive growth number.

Separate from the MAU number there is also the number of daily average users. And this tells us something about the actual usage of the service on a day-to-day basis. For BranchOut this number stood at 110,000 as of June 4, down from 650,000 just one month ago. The DAU has thus far fallen much sharper then the MAU, strongly indicating the rapid drying up of new registrants.

On any given day the DAU is a combination of the number of users signing up for BranchOut as well as returning users. If we conservatively assume that at least 50% of the DAU is made up out of new registrants, it also means that apart from this group nearly no one is actually using the service. How’s that?

Well, let’s do a simple experiment with the numbers. Assuming that 50% of the DAU are new registrants this means that over the course of the last 30 days some 6.5 million people have signed up for BranchOut. It also means that since Marini’s moment of fame on April 19 there will have been somewhere between 10 to 15 million new registrants, bringing the total of BranchOut registered users to a maximum of 40 million. A truly impressive number!

But the only number that tells us anything about the relevancy of the service is the number of users actually using it. And as of yesterday that number stands at 55,000. Or in other words, a whopping 0,14% of registered users. That’s massively lower than LinkedIn! And this incredibly low engagement figure would also immediately explain the head-scratching of pundits wondering where the value of BranchOut lies. And this number is may be much lower if we assume that the actual percentage of returning users within that DAU number is lower than 50%. Much lower.

BranchOut has peaked and is now returning back to earth at a neck-breaking pace. However, it is possibly not too late to start focusing on bringing actual value to registered users instead of focusing on media appearances. The $ 49 million in funding can be put to use to build something useful instead of daydreaming about an IPO and cashing in big. It requires real work, focus, and total user centricity. Then and only then is there a slim chance that BranchOut can become something of a LinkedIn challenger. Now it’s just a loudmouth brat with nothing to show for. There is still time to avoid the Deathpool, but time is running out fast.

This article is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended to offer specific legal advice. You should consult your legal counsel regarding any threatened or pending litigation.
  1. Quora Jun 5, 2012 at 6:23 pm

    What has caused Branchout’s usage (WAUs) to fall by almost 50% in the last 2 weeks?…

    Another theory here “How is it possible that at one moment a site can grow so fast only to suddenly reverse course and plummet nearly as fast? There is a word for such an ev…

  2. Heeft Identified soms goed naar BranchOut gekeken? | Recruitment nieuws | Recruitment Matters – Alles over online recruitment Jun 6, 2012 at 2:12 am

    […] De site heeft een zeer snelle groei laten zien, maar is ondertussen alweeer gehalveerd. Het is nog niet zo erg als BranchOut, maar ook Identified lijkt te hebben gepiekt. Er is helemaal geen groei! Het grote verschil met […]

  3. Maureen Sharib Jun 6, 2012 at 8:25 am

    I feel sorry for those investors.
    I feel sorry for any investor “investing” today in “social media.”

    “Torture numbers, and they’ll confess to anything.”

  4. Jay Silver Jun 6, 2012 at 12:13 pm

    Looks like Rick Marini has been spending too much time riding motorcycles.

  5. Wat zou dit betekenen? | Over RecruitmentMatters | Recruitment Matters – Alles over online recruitment Jun 7, 2012 at 1:33 am

    […] Wong heeft mijn LinkedIn profiel bekeken na publicatie van mijn artikel over BranchOut op ERE. Als goede complotdenker zou ik hieruit af kunnen leiden dat BranchOut een schot voor de boeg doet, […]

  6. BranchOut – The Rise and Fall and… | The ecom4 blog Jun 7, 2012 at 7:00 am

    […] For a few weeks Marc has been writing about the phenomenon that was BranchOut and we have covered the story in both RecruitmentMediaNews and the RecruitmentBuzz. So this week, we asked Marc to be our guest blogger. He has written a follow up article on BranchOut and very kindly shared this with us at ECOM4 and my friends in the US, […]

  7. BranchOut collapsing? This guy says so … | Jun 7, 2012 at 11:53 am

    […] writes on, a recruiter networking site, that BranchOut’s numbers have fallen off a […]

  8. Why the BranchOut Decline Isn’t Surpising | Product Talk Jun 7, 2012 at 2:48 pm

    […] this week, ERE wrote this article about the rapid decline of BranchOut over the past 30 days. Peaking at 13.9 million monthly active […]

  9. Jonathan Duarte Jun 12, 2012 at 10:17 am

    Great post!

    Sounds like Jobster Part II, except this time it wasn’t the HR and Recruiting community that got ripped off, it was the investor community buying another story about “How we are going to FIX recruiting” with their new widget.

    Here’s a real simple rule for investing in Recruiting Technology… If their is no impact on actual hires… don’t buy it.
    How many hires has BranchOut provided? Anyone? Anyone? No one?

    I still think the same way about LinkedIn… 580 P/E ratio? With a company valuation equal to over 25% of the entire Global Recruiting Valuation? Yet, it is only a secondary means of hiring (meaning very few direct hires come from the site). I’ll wait.

    Don’t get me wrong, LinkedIn is great, but the company isn’t responsible for 25% of Global Recruiting and therefore won’t be valued at that price for long.

  10. Quora Jun 19, 2012 at 4:10 am

    Why has Branchout’s traffic fallen by almost 50% in last few weeks?…

    Alison Hillman no longer works for BranchOut (the site is downsizing because of a still continuing decrease in traffic). A more realistic answer can be found here:

  11. BranchOut’s Trip to the Stars and Back to Earth | Job Board News Jun 19, 2012 at 4:33 am

    […] […]

  12. How You CAN’T Use Facebook to Find a Job Jun 20, 2012 at 11:36 am

    […] figures were there to attract more investors or users we don’t know. Some call BranchOut a giant Ponzi scheme, with user-friendly […]

  13. Quora Jun 20, 2012 at 5:49 pm

    Is BranchOut pivoting?…

    After raising $50M from VCs, I heard that a huge portion of their workforce quit / were fired and the site’s traffic has been in freefall. There’s been a lot of negative press recently on them (see below) as well. But what’s the real story? Is Branc…

  14. BranchOut Keeps Falling Down, Down – Jun 23, 2012 at 10:44 am

    […] has been nearly three weeks since I wrote about BranchOut’s meteoric rise and subsequent fall here on ERE. But because of the speed at which this LinkedIn clone continues to disintegrate, an […]

  15. Social Recruitment & Latino Talent | Jun 27, 2012 at 12:07 pm

    […] the role social media will play in finding and developing talent. Some new services are budding – others not so much. Bullhorn Reach summarizes the views of several thought leaders here. Given the increasing number […]

  16. Why Facebook Should Rethink it’s Planned Job Board | jobtrakr Jul 10, 2012 at 9:59 am

    […] taken out to the wood shed and blasted over their tactics.  One blogger amounted BranchOut to “nothing more than a Ponzi scheme”. […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: